Saturday 30 January 2010

Take The Edge Off: A Review of 'Edge of Darkness'



In the pilot episode of the BBC television serial ‘Edge of Darkness’ from 1985, the father of a woman who has been gunned down is consoled by a co-worker. This co-worker herself breaks down and begins to cry. The father, police detective Thomas Craven, gently hugs her in return, but morosely asks her to stop crying, “otherwise we’ll all be at it.” This scene does not occur in the blockbuster film remake of the show, and if it did then star Mel Gibson would probably shoot the woman for getting in his way. Thomas Craven is no longer a downbeat stoic Northerner, but a brashly Catholic Bostonian. So too the story is no longer a meticulous revelation of human frailty and corruption, but a conspiracy thriller.

There is nothing inherently wrong with these changes, and the first hour or so of the film is strong. The relationship between Craven and his daughter is believable, his grief at her death effective, and the suggestion of corporate malfeasance intriguing. Director Martin Campbell was also behind the original show, and the introduction of both the Boston setting and writer William Monahan to the mix are successful. Themes of parentage and mortality surface, and a quiet conversation at a kitchen table is frankly superb.

Then, at around the halfway point, there is a shocking car accident which strains credulity to breaking point. From here, it’s only a matter of time before cabals of villains plot and scheme, friends become betrayers, and Craven goes renegade with just a gun and a snarl.

The shift in the final reel is so out of keeping with what has occurred before that it might yet be a big joke. Suffice to say, anyone struggling to conclude their own screenplays concerning labyrinthine mazes of incident and intent could take a leaf out of Monahan’s book, but only if they’re willing to write the phrase “then he gets shot in the head” a few dozen times. I have previously been a great fan of his work in ‘The Departed’ and ‘Kingdom of Heaven’, and while he sprinkles references to F. Scott Fitzgerald and Diogenes throughout ‘Edge of Darkness’, it’s clear Monahan has no handle on the story he’s telling or what it’s trying to say. The original was about British anxieties concerning nuclear power and the political manoeuvring of labour unions; what the 2010 version is about is anybody’s guess. (Perhaps the absurd illogic at the centre of the conspiracy is intentional, and the whole thing is actually a parody.)

Taken on its own terms, the film should perhaps be seen with an even dimmer view. Ray Winstone masters the sly black ops man he is given, but is then given nothing to do for much of the time. An awareness of the consequences of the frequent violent altercations is hinted at, but then never addressed. It is fair to assume that these problems stem from the re-shoots asked by the studio, which result in utterly pointless kidnappings and nauseating moral lurches. Yet, the studio is ‘Icon Productions’, whose figurehead is Mel Gibson – surely he knew what he was signing up for? Of all the praiseworthy things that can – and should – be claimed of the 1985 serial, that it has commercial viability and brand recognition surely are not among them.

Much like the Hollywood version of ‘State of Play’, another British television series, too much happens too fast and not a lot feels like it makes any sense, which is a consequence of condensing six hours of story into two, and adding gunfights. Perhaps it is time for traffic to move the other way, and for the BBC to create a compelling six-part drama from the screenplay for ‘Payback’, or a subdued political chamber-piece from ‘Commando’. Or maybe ITV could produce a 90-minute action film based on seasons 1 – 3 of ‘The Wire’.

At least such experiments would generate more of a reaction than stunned disappointment, ebbing away into resigned apathy.

Thursday 7 January 2010

The Best Films of 2009

Avatar

A sensory spectacular. To quote a colleague, ‘a masterpiece, if the most flawed movie ever to get such acclaim.’



‘The Hurt Locker’

Kathryn Bigelow returns from the wasteland with a meticulous unpacking of the twenty-first century American military psyche. It’s the modern-day ‘Platoon’, only well written.



‘In The Loop’

Whether Armando Iannucci is aware that his teetering-on-the-borderline-of-immaturity satire ends up compartmentalising the blame for the Iraq war to an out-of-control spin doctor, thus for the most part excusing the (here unseen) world leaders from blame, is immaterial: well-made, caustically written, and always on the move, ‘In The Loop’ was an outright success.



The International

While other films of its ilk are happy to rest on the sobriquet ‘70s-style’, this precise but invested thriller managed to be both of its time (a banking crisis!) and timeless (how does the individual function within the system?) in its concerns.



‘Public Enemies’

In an example of superlative filmmaking, if not run-away entertainment, Michael Mann somehow marries the men-with-guns pomposity of his digital crime thrillers with the spooky existentiality of ‘Manhunter’.



Honorary mentions:

‘The Taking of Pelham 123’ (played to my fondness for New York-based heist thrillers), ‘The Hangover’ (a welcome tonic from the Apatow-domination of bromances), ‘Rachel Getting Married’ (bravely down-to-earth cinema about the dawn of responsibility), ‘Duplicity’ (not so much about the art of conning as the art of film-making, and how god-awfully repetitive and meaningless it becomes after a while), and ‘Let The Right One In’ (cool, stylish, scary, and very well made).




The Pros and Cons of ‘Daybreakers’



The Cons:

- Someone drives a classic car through a plate glass window

- Willem Dafoe doesn’t die horribly.

- A Humvee explodes.

- It stars Ethan Hawke.

- The trailer features Placebo covering Kate Bush. The movie does not.

- Just when you think there isn’t going to be a vampire massacre … there’s a vampire massacre. In slow motion.


On the other hand…


The Pros:

- Someone drives a classic car through a plate glass window

- Willem Dafoe doesn’t die horribly.

- A Humvee explodes.

- It stars Ethan Hawke.

- The trailer features Placebo covering Kate Bush. The movie does not.

- Just when you think there isn’t going to be a vampire massacre … there’s a vampire massacre. In slow motion.

Saturday 2 January 2010

22 Things I Learned From ‘Sherlock Holmes’

1. Having a limp that requires a cane in no way hampers fighting, wrestling or running.

2. Rachel McAdams takes forever to put on a dressing gown.

3. Beginning a story in media res is both bracing and dramatically convenient.

4. Giant comedy henchmen impervious to punches, kicks or several electrocutions are funny.

5. The sewers beneath Parliament are easy to access, lead directly to the top of Tower Bridge, and travelling from one landmark to the other takes only a few seconds on foot.

6. Obscuring the villain’s face in shadow is not an acceptable cinematic device.

7. A dog farting is not an acceptable comedy punch line.

8. An antiquated ambi-pure machine full of poison is not an acceptable dramatic crux.

9. It’s only appropriate that Sherlock Holmes resemble Peter Falk, since the nineteenth century detective is really just an earlier incarnation of Columbo.

10. It’s hard to get excited about the possibility of a cabal of elderly white gentleman wrestling control of Britain from another cabal of elderly white gentleman.

11. Guy Ritchie never met a fight he wouldn’t rather see in super slo-mo.

12. Composer Hans Zimmer’s score is so good that it must be played as loud as possible, preferably obscuring sound effects, dialogue, and the thought process of the audience.

13. Construction work on a major London landmark is never undertaken in the middle of a weekday.

14. No one wears shirts quite like Robert Downey Jr.

15. There’s always a lower ledge.

16. Somebody always puts their foot in a loop of rope.

17. The celebratory glass of wine is always drugged.

18. Bare knuckle fighting is a purely cerebral exercise.

19. In these kinds of things, wife-to-be characters require neither distinguishing characteristics of any kind nor chemistry with their betrothed.

20. Conclusive – or even remotely satisfying – endings are not necessary when riding the train to franchise-ville.

21. If Arthur Conan Doyle had co-written a Bond movie with the makers of ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ this is what it would look like.

22. That this exercise in faux-retro steam-punk blockbusterised nonsense is as entertaining as it turns out to be is something of a miracle, and a welcome one.